Link
i will say I have mixed feelings about this publication, not because I don't think it's good and insightful and thoughtful, but because of their whole "we're so sincere," anti-Eggersard (Eggersian? Eggers-esque?) stance---though to be honest, I'm not sure if this was a stance envisioned by its celebrated creators or invented by the critics (or maybe a bit of both?). If the former, it does feel a little self-important and contrived: (whiney tone)" I wanted to be Eggers! That 30-something idiot got to it before I did, so now we have to do something different!" And, of course, I suppose each movement is a backlash or response to (derivative of?) the one before it, right? Although these are both pretty contemporary. Who knows. I'll stop there. hope you enjoy the read. and hope the link works.